The Orange Democratic Movement has been in the news as jostling picks up ahead of the party elections. 
The
 kind of interest the pulling and shoving has generated indicates that 
it is not just about who is who in the emerging line-ups; it is about 
the fate of ODM as a viable political vehicle heading towards the 2017 
General Election and, in particular, the prospects of Mr Raila Odinga as
 the party leader contemplates a fourth, and probably final, 
presidential bid. 
An outfit that loves to shoot itself
 in the foot, ODM has generated plenty of negative publicity, to the 
delight of detractors more than keen to read Mr Odinga’s political 
obituary.
The issue has been Mr Odinga resisting a push
 by a section of the party aspirants from his Luo Nyanza bedrock to 
reserve all the key offices for themselves.
It is 
incredible that in this day and age characters who call themselves Young
 Turks, a modern, educated and cosmopolitan lot angling to drive ODM to 
the next level, can offer such retrogressive, backward leadership.
After
 the demise of former sole legal party, Kanu, as well as Ford, 
Democratic Party, Ford Kenya, Ford Asili, Narc, Narc Kenya, and a motley
 of other outfits and offshoots that rose and fell after the advent of 
political pluralism, ODM is perhaps the only remaining party that can 
claim anything approaching the status of national political party.
True,
 it is very much associated with Mr Odinga and Luo political 
aspirations, but it has representation and following across Kenya that 
makes it a formidable political organisation. With its Cord alliance 
partner, the Wiper party of former vice-president Kalonzo Musyoka, it at
 present offers the only viable challenge to the governing Jubilee 
coalition of President Uhuru Kenyatta’s The National Party (TNA) and 
Deputy President William Ruto’s United Republican Party (URP).
Incredible
 then that, instead of working to build up ODM’s national and 
nationalist credentials, a bunch of short-sighted politicians is doing 
the opposite in trying to depict the party as an insular, ethnic outfit.
A
 look at the cast of characters reveals some politicians simply trying 
to use the ethnic base to build their own leadership credentials.
Some
 are simply playing Luo succession politics in the belief that Mr 
Odinga, approaching the age of three-score and ten, is on his last legs.
 Others stand for nothing but unprincipled self-seeking pursuit of power
 and position. 
They consorted with the dictatorial and
 corrupt Kanu when it was in power and are already showing a tendency to
 traffic with the Jubilee leadership in transactions that can only be 
designed to weaken ODM.
Mr Odinga reacted firmly and 
decisively in telling off those seeking ODM leadership on the Luo 
platform. When he stood firm, a bunch of declared candidates pulled out 
of the party polls.
Unfortunately, the spate of sullen 
withdrawals also served to illustrate the grip he has on the party and 
Luo politics. It demonstrated a dictatorial control reminiscent of the 
Mama na Baba era in Kanu when President Moi presented pre-determined 
party lists at those infamous cheering festivals and hero-worship 
gatherings that comprised the Kanu Delegates Conference.
We
 still do not know exactly how the lot now being called party rebels was
  persuaded to step down, but it might have been better for ODM to leave
 space for all aspirants and let democracy prevail.
How
 ODM manages the party elections and from then on the critical period 
leading to 2017 will largely help Kenyans make up their minds whether it
 offers a serious, disciplined, principled, and democratic alternative.
Mr
 Odinga does not need reminding that the chaotic party nominations ahead
 of the last General Election did much to take away the momentum from 
ODM and the Cord alliance and hand victory to Jubilee.
Another
 botched exercise, especially with moneyed rivals waiting to throw 
spanners into the works and reap from the fallout, could well be the 
final nail in the coffin.
 


 
No comments:
Post a Comment